Andy Warhol Fdn., Inc. v. Lynn Goldsmith et al, Brief Of Amici Curiae Library Futures Institute, The Software Preservation Network, The Everylibrary Institute, The American Library Association, The Association Of College And Research Libraries, And The Association Of Research Libraries In Support Of Neither Party

Other
Authors:Butler, Brandon, LB-Univ Librarian-GeneralUniversity of Virginia ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0003-0190-6165Courtney, Kyle, LibraryHarvard University Ziskina, JuliyaLibrary Futures Institute
Abstract:

The Court’s decision in this case may bear directly on the interests of visual artists who rely on existing works as raw material for their own creations, but it could also affect far more. As the Court considers how to decide this case in light of its deep and recently reaffirmed commitment to a robust fair use doctrine, it should keep in mind the substantial progress enabled by its past decisions. In particular, it should consider the interests of some of fair use’s core beneficiaries: libraries, archives, cultural heritage institutions, and their users.

Keywords:
copyright, libraries, fair use, art, art history, Andy Warhol, Prince Rogers Nelson, U.S. Supreme Court, portrait, appropriate art, derivative work, photography, screen printing, Vanity Fair, Lynn Goldsmith
Language:
English
Publisher:
University of Virginia
Published Date:
June 17, 2022
Notes:

Amicus brief filed on behalf of library organizations in Supreme Court case dealing with scope of fair use doctrine as applied to visual art.